At 10:41 AM -0700 2006-08-24, John W. Baxter wrote:
> Is there any interest in sanitizing the FAQ by adjusting examples to follow
> RFC 2606 as closely as possible? I'm reasonably sure that 2.003 isn't the
> only entry which could use adjustment.
Sure, that's a great idea. The Mailman FAQ Wizard is a
community-supported facility, and all the information you need for
making updates or creating entire new entries is provided on the
page. In a way, this is kind of like a wiki, although it has a much
simpler syntax, and is a lot easier than most wikis that I've
encountered.
If you're up for it, please go ahead and make the appropriate changes.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
Founding Individual Sponsor of LOPSA. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
