Ryan Steele wrote: >I think I've actually identified the problem.
I don't think so. >Here is an excerpt from the mail header: > >>Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id e.cef.43ab224 (57293); >> Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:41:44 -0500 (EST) >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:41:42 EST > >And here is a message from Mailman's bounce log: > > >Dec 13 09:42:38 2006 (2202) bounce message w/no discernable addresses: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Dec 13 09:42:38 2006 (2202) forwarding unrecognized, message-id: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For whatever reason, Mailman treated the message-id that AOL gave it as >the sender address...thus causing the "Uncaught bounce notification" >error. The actual bounce occurred because it was sent for moderator >approval due to the large number of recipients: No. The 'bounce' occurred because one of the recipients was the Igcpgrads-bounces address. > >vette:Dec 13 09:38:51 2006 (2204) Igcpgrads post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >held, message-id=<cce.5a1853c.3 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Too many recipients to the message And the message was held because the number of explicit addresses in To: and Cc: of the message was greater than or equal to Privacy options...->Recipient filters->max_num_recipients. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
