Ivan Van Laningham writes: > But the <head> element is not being produced in one place.
I'm not talking about the HEAD element. Before the HTML, the gods have placed the HTTP headers. It seems reasonably likely that there is one place where an appropriate HTTP header could be inserted in all replies. I had a vague recollection that there was an HTTP header that could be used to associate external resources with an HTTP reply, just as the LINK element does for an HTML document). Now that I have time to look, I can't find a reference to such an entity, so even if it does exist, it's hardly likely to be implemented. (If it did, it would be oh-so-convenient for this purpose ... <shrug> sometimes you just get lucky, worth a try, no?) Unless that rings a bell with somebody, we should just forget it, and move on to discussion of which template language to use for Mailman 2.3. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
