Ivan Van Laningham wrote: >I just ran across this proposal from Yahoo: > >http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys > >I was examining headers from some yahoogroup email for reasons having to >do with non-delivery when I ran across the domainkey header. > >Has anyone on the list given any thought to it? Is it a Good Thing(tm)? > Or yet another way for Yahoo to try to dominate the planet? > >There's a qmail patch available, which is what I'm using, and I wonder >if there would be Mailman integration issues? I assume that an >unmodified Mailman installation would ignore the domainkey header.
See the threads with subject "dkim-signature headers" at <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2007-February/thread.html>. Executive summary: Mailman currently removes DomainKey-Signature: and DKIM-Signature: headers from posts and from mail to the -owner address. This is probably not the right thing to do. Beginning in Mailman 2.1.10, the removal of these headers will be controlled by a mm_cfg.py option with the default being to not remove them. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
