On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 1:40:19 PM, Steven Stern wrote: SS> On 08/09/2008 12:16 PM, Robert Braver wrote: [...]
SS> | This means you will have to track down the individual message by SS> | the Message ID in order to identify the email address of the SS> | specific recipient. SS> If you add personalization in the footer, AOL will not redact it. Today, yes, but not after the changes being made by AOL that is the subject of this thread. http://postmaster.info.aol.com/fbl/arfinfo.html What is the difference between the traditional AOL Feedback Loop format and ARF? The traditional format is a MIME multipart message with one empty text part and one message/rfc822 part with the original message being complained about. Parts of the header of the message being complained about are redacted out, where normally the AOL ScreenName recipient would be present. ARF is defined in a internet draft located at http://www.mipassoc.org/arf/ . ARF messages have three mime parts, one part for general information, one machine parsable and meta data part, and the last part as the original message being complained about. **** The original message is redacted to protect clear text occurrences of AOL screen names and email addresses. **** An example ARF report (with redacted message) is provided on the page referenced above. -- Best regards, Robert Braver [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
