On 08/25/09 22:57, Mark Sapiro wrote:
That is the user based solution.
Agreed.
The list admin based solution is to add per...@example.com or ^person(\+.*)?...@example\.com to accept_these_nonmembers.
I don't know if I would call that a "solution" so much as I would a (per user) "work around".
I would be much more interested in a per list option as to whether or not to honor (understand and utilize) user+detail addresses. I would consider that to be a true solution.
Grant. . . . ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
