On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
think about changing this?
Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be
there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.
I think the solution to the OP's problem is to have a way to create a
'Roach Motel' list, that is, one where the subscribers cannot unsub.
However, that setting should be 1) hard to find and 2) have BLINK tag
warnings on it.
--
"Let's get back to syntax of procmail and forget the syntax of
fools." Don
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
