On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people think about changing this?Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.
Historically, the option to remove them was added because people complained that their MUA (that shall remain nameless) could not hide them.
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
