On 06/16/2014 06:36 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > While the idea of identifying a DMARC bounce and "forwarding" the > > original post to the bounced recipient wrapped in some boilerplate about > > the need to do so has some appeal, I think the implementation would be > > too messy to contemplate. If you wish to try, the code is at > > <https://code.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1> aka 'bzr branch > > lp:mailman/2.1'. > > For wrapping the message, the logic in dmarc_moderation_action is much > more efficient. It checks for DMARC p=reject at the Author Domain, > and then does something. Wrapping the message so that the "outside" > message is "From:" the list and the inside message is the original > (modified per list policy) is one option. I'm not sure if there's any > way to specify an explanatory message, but it would be easy to add > such an option.
Yes, what Stephen says is correct. It would be a simple matter to add say a dmarc_wrapped_message_text field which text if provided would be added as a separate MIME text/plain part along with the wrapped message when the message was wrapped due to dmarc_moderation_action. What I was saying was "too messy to contemplate" was the notion of sending the post with the original From: to all recipients and then resending a wrapped message only to those recipients that bounce the original. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org