On 06/20/2015 06:39 PM, Yasir Assam wrote: > Is there any way I can get hotmail to reply to the list when the From: > header is munged? Is munging considered bad form (when not mitigating > DMARC reject policies)?
It may not have been clear from my earlier reply, but yes, From Munging is considered bad form. It violates the basic email RFCs definition of the meaning of the From: header. It is best not to do it unconditionally, and a better response to DMARC mitigation is Wrap Message, but that said we recognize that Wrap Message creates issues for some (particularly moblie device) MUAs so that in some cases at least, Munge From is the most acceptable mitigation. It is best if only applied when needed via dmarc_moderation_action and not unconditionally via from_is_list. On a different subject, I have looked a bit further, and with what I understand your list settings to be, i.e. Full Personalization, from_is_list = Munge From, reply_goes_to_list = Poster; I think even with 2.1.18 the list posting address will be put in or added to Cc:, and the original From: will be in Reply-To:. Thus any reasonable MUA should 'reply' to the original From: and 'reply-all' to the original From: and the list. If the headers are as I say and Hotmail is not doing this, then Hotmail is behaving badly as the Reply-To: should override the list address in the From:, but it shouldn't affect replying-all to a Cc:. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
