On 7/11/25 17:27, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
Yes. And there are people who will do the same. Supporting postmaster@ has been a de facto and de jure requirement for decades, and I won't accept ANY excuse for failure to do so. Same for abuse@, security@ and (in the case of any domain with a web site) webmaster@ and (if used in DNS SOA records) hostmaster@. All competent, responsible, professionals (and even competent, responsible amateurs) support these: it's systems admin 101.
LOL. Have you seen sExchange'365? Dima ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
