So to recap (please correct any errors):
* There is a folder locally in MlMt called **Junk**; this same folder
does **not** exist on the Fastmail server.
* There is a folder on the Fastmail server called **Spam**; this same
folder does **not** exist locally in MlMt.
* SpamAssassin is running on the Fastmail side.
* The message in question was moved to the local **Junk** folder but
**not** the **Spam** folder on the Fastmail side.
* The message in question had header info that indicates it was
evaluated by SpamAssassin and also had a relatively high Spam score
(7.2).
If the above is accurate, then the next 2 things I would like to know
are:
* What happened to the message on the Fastmail side? Meaning in which
folder did it land?
* If you right-click on the local **Junk** folder and then goto
“Mailbox Type”, how is it mapped?
- - -
On 26 Jul 2021, at 8:00, Ralph Alvy wrote:
I forgot to mention that the Junk folder is not on the Fastmail
server. It is only a local folder created by MailMate. That seems to
suggest the only way it got there is via MailMate itself.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, at 7:13 AM, Ralph Alvy wrote:
But Fastmail has its own folder for that. It's called Spam. And it
did not put it in that folder.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, at 7:51 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2021-07-25 at 20:15:31 UTC-0400 (Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:15:31 -0700)
Ralph Alvy <mailmate@lists.freron.com>
is rumored to have said:
I have no Inbox rules at all. Here are the Sieve relevant lines in
the
raw message:
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0
X-Spam-known-sender: no
X-Spam-sender-reputation: 500 (none)
X-Spam-score: 7.2
X-Spam-hits: HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.248,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST 0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE 0.001, ME_HAS_VSSU 0.001, ME_SENDERREP_NEUTRAL
0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001, SPF_PASS -0.001,
URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM 7, LANGUAGES en, BAYES_USED none, SA_VERSION
3.4.2
That's a SpamAssassin header, added by the server. Your mail
provider
put that message in Junk, not MailMate. The total score of 7.2 is
significantly above the default SA threshold score for spam (5.0)
but
the 'X-Spam-hits' itemization shows that almost entirely due to one
issue: the "URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM" hit scored at 7. That hit
indicates
that there was a link in the message body whose domain is listed in
the
Spamhaus DBL list: https://www.spamhaus.org/dbl. It is rare for the
DBL
to list domains that are not exclusively used in spam, but it does
happen.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
