> On 16 Feb 2015, at 15:01, Gil Bahat <g...@magisto.com> wrote: > > I don't think I have ever seen a message with the Auto-Submitted header. I > will try to run checks whether providers actually do support this, or that's > dead letter, like half of the RFCs out there…
Newsletters from wired-gov.net include them. I know this, ironically, because they get so much else wrong that we log the headers in our rejectlog. We don’t log headers for messages that we accept, so I don’t know how many use Auto-Submitted. Also, our site’s (Exim generated) out of office messages use Auto-Submitted, because Exim’s Auto-reply transport adds them. They also respect Auto-submitted, because the Exim filter option "personal" checks for the header. > As for outlook.com and office 365, I've seen that they actually do implement > outlook-specific features (e.g. X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL on messages > failing DMARC), so I am hopeful that this may get implemented. > > additionally, they may have implemented it and I am not in fact seeing real > autoreply, but rather spam disguised as autoreply or autoreply from an MUA > which draws mail via POP/IMAP. it's not easy to tell the two without > conducting quite a bit of testing. > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
