That has been widely discussed many times, I'd suggest starting with the
DMARC FAQ here: https://dmarc.org/wiki/FAQ

And yes, it has a negative impact on a number of practices, probably the
worst impact to many technical folks is the effect on mailing lists.

Brandon

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Geoff Mulligan <ge...@proto6.com> wrote:

> I guess what I'm trying to understand is why anyone would base their
> acceptance or rejection on the 822 From: header.  It seems that this causes
> mailing list managers to have to jump through hoops to rewrite the From:
> header in strange ways.
>
>         Geoff
>
>
>
> On 06/15/2016 06:16 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
>
> So, we've been doing dmarc rejects for many years, for Yahoo.com since
> they went p=reject two years ago.
>
> We may sometimes override the rejection, but no one should rely on that.
>
> I don't know of anything that has changed recently about this.
>
> Forwarding doesn't break with this unless you modify the mail or the
> original message wasn't dkim authenticated.  We've seen some recent
> examples of banks going p=quarantine while only doing spf auth, which
> obviously doesn't survive forwarding.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Jun 15, 2016 1:57 AM, "Jeffry Dwight" <jeffry.dwi...@greyware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the bad example. We don't use spaces when sending email out,
>> although
>> as Jon Postel would have approved, we accept them for incoming mail.
>> There are a
>> lot of broken MTAs out there.
>>
>> Jeffry
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>> From: <ml+mai...@esmtp.org>
>> To: mailop@mailop.org
>> CC:
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:23:36 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [mailop] change at gmail???
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, Jeffry Dwight wrote:
>>
>> > MAIL FROM:
>> > RCPT TO:
>>
>> RFC 5321                          SMTP                      October 2008
>> ..
>>    Since it has been a common source of errors, it is worth noting that
>>    spaces are not permitted on either side of the colon following FROM
>>    in the MAIL command or TO in the RCPT command.  The syntax is exactly
>>    as given above.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing 
> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> --
>
> *--*
> *Â Geoff Mulligan*
> *Â Chairman LoRa Alliance*
> *Â Founder IPSO Alliance*
> *Â Former White House Presidential Innovation Fellow*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to