That is what I was thinking. I wasn’t sure if there is a specific reason the preference is called out in the RFC.
Thanks, Brian > On Jul 14, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Mark Foster <blak...@blakjak.net> wrote: > > Surely if the MX record is declared as a . then the preference is irrelevant? > > > On 15/07/2016 8:38 a.m., Brian Godiksen wrote: >> I noticed inconsistencies in how domains are publishing null MX records. In >> RFC7505 it states these records should be published with a preference number >> 0. I am seeing a variety of preferences specified though. >> >> Example: >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;hotmai.com. IN MX >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> hotmai.com. 2530 IN MX 10 . >> >> Is anyone ignoring the preference number in their implementation? >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> _______________________________________________ >> mailop mailing list >> mailop@mailop.org >> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
