Tim, >From my understanding, the nslookup reverseIP.score.senderscore.com will result in showing the Return Path Sender Score for that IP. Here's some info I quickly found: http://www.dattaproffs.se/2017/02/22/check-your-ips-senderscore-from-the-commandline/
If that's what you're doing, and you're seeing your Sender Score, you'll actually not want to see it get to 0 - you'll want to see it get to as close to 100 <https://www.senderscore.org/faq/>as possible! If you have an IP in the 50s/60s, you can probably expect to see mail delivery issues. Hope that helps clear things up on Sender Score. Justin On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:23 AM, <timrutherf...@c4.net> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Has anyone else had experience with SenderScore RBL? > > > > I find one of our domains on their blacklist and have addressed the issue > that presumably got us there, but having difficulty getting any “real” > estimates as to how long it will take for our IP reputation to recover. > > > > My understanding is that an NSlookup against a particular zone shows if > the IP is listed and the last digit indicates the current spam reputation > for the blacklisted entry > > > > nslookup zzz.yyy.xxx.vvv.score.senderscore.com (where vvv.xxx.yyy.zzz > is the IP you wish to lookup) > > > > (our is currently 58, it was 69 last night) > > > > Based on that rate of roughly 9 points in 15 hours, it’s going to be a > long week if we need to get to “0”. Does anyone know if that speeds up > (“snowballs”) as the reputation improves and/or what threshold it takes to > move from “poor” to “neutral” ? > > > > I understand that the whole system is automated and can’t be “nudged > along”, but SenderScore’s estimate of “a few hours to just over a week” is > a bit too vague to be of value. > > > > They also couldn’t provide any specifics on the message(s) that triggered > the block aside from “approximate time of last spam message” – which makes > it hard to correlate which messages triggered the event. > > > > We are not on any other blacklists but this one is negatively affecting > some of our larger customers. Murphy’ s Law… > > > > Thanks, > > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
