On 11/02/2017 12:49 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote:
Ouch, I can name a hundred reasons to..
Sorry, let me clarify.I see no reason to reject messages at SMTP time just because you might choose not to display all of the message in the default view, yet make it available in a full message view.
I.e. why reject an otherwise perfectly legitimate email to a perfectly legitimate recipient when dmesg out put is in the body of the message vs as an attachment?
Rejecting immediately with a clear notice, allows the sender to identify why the message didn't go through..
I agree that rejecting at SMTP time is the best thing to do, for warranted reasons. - I think that a long message body (that is still smaller than published maximums) is not a valid reason in and of itself.
Need I go on?
Not about rejecting at SMTP time vs bouncing after the fact.I'm curious why you would reject a message just because the MUA might choose to fold / not display some of the body by default, yet make it available at the click of a button.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
