On 1/10/2019 10:44 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
you are de-valuing mine,
Actually, your opinion about these organizations was important and noteworthy. if someone has a conflict of interest, it *is* helpful to get feedback indicating that such an entity is reported to be operating ethically, even if the conflict of interest remains. That is noteworthy and valued. So I actually *do* value your opinion on this matter. I just think you have a poor understanding of how/why some entity's ethics doesn't and shouldn't necessarily be enough to counter the problems caused by them having a "conflict of interest" (even if your opinions are still very helpful)
strictly because I have a biz agreement with some entity you dislike.
You're attributing beliefs/opinions/feels/assumptions to me that I haven't expressed. The PRINCIPLES I expressed stand alone and stand on their own apart from my feelings or motivations or likes or dislikes. I'm morbidly fascinated that you can't see that. (but as an INTP personality type - I'm wired to have an objectivity that often transcends and overcomes my own personal feelings - one that is often brutally honest, even to a point that I am my worst critic!)
I gave you, and this list, my fair assessment of the entity based on years of doing business with them
And as I said, that was valuable (even if PARTLY "besides the point") -- Rob McEwen https://www.invaluement.com
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
