Sorry François, it really took me quite some time to realize what you tried to tell me. Thank you. ;-)
> Am 25.01.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Francois Petillon <fan...@proxad.net>: > > On 1/25/19 12:42 PM, Eike Armbrust wrote: >> I sent my requests to t...@rx.t-online.de<mailto:t...@rx.t-online.de> (this >> address is listed in the error message I see in the logs) and always got a >> reply. My problem is this ridiculous rule of blocking server because of a >> single forwarded spam email. > > Yes, I understood. This is why I quoted the mail they are sending me > from time to time and in particular these sentences : > >> Outgoing emails are directed compulsory through a spam filter. But of >> course there is no spam filter which separates 100% spam. We go to any >> lengths to reduce the load of other systems to the least possible >> degree. But you cannot change the parameters in an arbitrary manner >> because an automatic spam filter would reject more and more emails as >> 'spam' which aren't spam. > > I thought you would really appreciate... > > In my case, they are blacklisted on ratios (~65% of mails are detected > as spams & 40% of mails are sent to non-existent mailboxes). > > François _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
