On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:06 AM John Levine via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> In article < > 0bb4f8da-c245-cd70-0dee-60801aa3c...@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> you > write: > >On 6/26/19 9:15 AM, John Levine via mailop wrote: > >> Once again, with free services, sometimes you get what you pay for. > > ... > > >The organization in this context /seems/ /to/ /have/ [1] a local policy > >that requires email purportedly from their users to their users to go > >through their MSA and reject such email at their MTA. > > > >That seems perfectly reasonable to me. > There's a correct way to implement this policy, and a way that's hostile to your users but may be simpler. The correct way involves using authentication. They chose the other way. > Some mail systems have a goal of delivering the legitimate mail that > that their users want. Some evidently don't. Personally I would > prefer to use the first kind, but opinions apparently vary. > > There are free mail systems that manage to deal with this situation > without losing legitimate mail. > Yes. Brandon
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
