> It does seem like Google could notice "old" date headers and BCCs and the fact the mail is coming from a dedicated spam factory and maybe treat it a little differently, though.
My point exactly. They could maybe notice it's hard failing SPF, or rDNS, or just about every requirement they have published. [image: Sender] Edgar Vaitkevičius, founder / CEO ed...@sender.net On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:09 PM Alan Hodgson via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 17:28 +0000, Simon Arlott via mailop wrote: > > On 2 March 2022 17:12:14 GMT, Edgaras | SENDER via mailop < > mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > There's literally nothing you can do as a sender to prevent your > reputation from being trashed. > > > No, that's quite clearly not literally true. Stop DKIM signing the spam > email and the problem goes away. > > > This. If you're sending mail on behalf of a stranger, perhaps you should > only sign it with their domain. > > It does seem like Google could notice "old" date headers and BCCs and the > fact the mail is coming from a dedicated spam factory and maybe treat it a > little differently, though. > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
