hmmm, I have one for covici.com -- does this not cover the subdomain?
I don't even think my registrar can have an spf for a subdomain.

On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:08:18 -0500,
Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> 
> One very obvious one I hit right away. You seem to be sending
> from @ccs.covici.com, and it has no SPF record:
> https://www.whatsmydns.net/#TXT/ccs.covici.com
> 
> A good, solid SPF record is a bare minimum these days. Google is
> requiring it more than ever, and while the message they're giving
> you isn't the one I'm used to seeing for that, every negative
> point about the email you send is a mark against you which means
> every aspect you can improve on is relevant.
> 
> On 2023-01-17 18:03, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> > OK, well, now I can't send even to a single gmail address.  What is
> > mail-tester.com  --I have never used it?  Is it a website?
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:20:09 -0500,
> > Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 2023-01-17 17:06, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> >> > Still broke for me.
> >> 
> >> I believe your issue was different from the one in this thread
> >> and best summarized by your message in that separate thread:
> >> 
> >> On 2023-01-17 10:31, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> >> > Hi.   For some reason this morning, I am having problems sending to
> >> > gmail addresses.  I get the following error for each:
> >> >
> >> > <<< 550-5.7.1 [166.84.7.93      12] Our system has detected that this
> >> > message is
> >> > <<< 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of spam
> >> > sent to Gmail,
> >> > <<< 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. Please visit
> >> > <<< 550-5.7.1
> >> > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError
> >> >  Now I have had no problems sending to gmail, but this message was
> >> >  send to maybe 40 users or so -- is this my problem, or am I doing
> >> >  something else wrong?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> >> 
> >> It's arguable which is worse, but this is definitely different
> >> than spam folder delivery. I would argue your situation is better
> >> because I'd rather know it wasn't delivered than tell someone to
> >> check their spam folder, because people just don't and you have
> >> little clear insight into the fact that they absolutely need to
> >> look there. That said, I just performed a log audit and I do not
> >> see a recent increase in these error messages from our side. I'm
> >> not Google, obviously, but we process enough email that I feel
> >> like polling my logs can easily indicate a trend of lack thereof.
> >> 
> >> My first instinct in your position would be to use something like
> >> mail-tester.com to get a basic check over your headers, DNS,
> >> etc. I know it's not wildly popular on this list but in a world
> >> where the average user still runs to mxtoolbox, mail-tester.com
> >> is exponentially better in it's assessments.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mailop mailing list
> >> mailop@mailop.org
> >> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
> >> 
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
> 

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici wb2una
         cov...@ccs.covici.com
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to