On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:54:28PM +0000, Slavko via mailop wrote: > Dňa 12. mája 2023 13:40:14 UTC používateľ Paul Gregg via mailop > <mailop@mailop.org> napísal: > > >4.5.3.1. Size Limits and Minimums > > When you read RFC, you MUST read all, not only interesting parts. > Yes, sometime it is hard, but notice the sentence in this section: > > Every implementation MUST be able to receive objects of at > least these sizes. > > I understand that these limits are not maximum which can be > used, but rather minimum which have to be supported. That > is shown in the same section latter: > > To the maximum extent possible, implementation techniques > that impose no limits on the length of these objects should be > used. > > It IMO clearly suggests to not limit these things.
I'm not here to throw stones at semantic reasoning, but it is really difficult to read "The maximum total length of " to mean "support this at a minumum but feel free to blow way past it". My original question was if the 64 octet limit is pointless now. Seems like it is. PG _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
