On 10/27/10, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: > Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: >... >> secondly, you invoke "the community": however, "the community" has not >> been involved in this. merely a subset of maintainers. not even all >> maintainers have authoritatively been polled. > > Alright then I'm asking for a vote on this issue. >
That is certainly a better course of action, than a subset of maintainers having a meeting, that discriminates against other maintainers by force of physical location, and then declaring "things 'must' change". However, you are still not being properly considerate of the full community. The "community" affected here, is the ENTIRE OpenCSW community: both maintainers *and* users. Therefore, we should prepare a proper poll that allows for full participation of the entire community affected. The poll wording needs to also be openly reviewed for some period of time, to ensure inclusiveness and fairness. Are you volunteering to write the initial wording, or are you requesting someone else draft it? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
