Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: >>... >> Thus, here is the reformulated call for vote: >> >> Do you, as an active foundation maintainer, agree to relive the current >> limit of packages name from the current 20 characters to the 32 >> characters defined by the current packaging system? >> > > That is more reasonable. And something I can actually support, myself. > That being said, I dont think it appropriate to change it, without > some notice and call for discussion from the full user base. > > I'll post something to announce, and users. > I think a minimum wait of 2 weeks for any feedback is appropriate.
As usual, you do just like you wish and didn't take into account a proposal. This manifest again your disdain for us. Alright, I'll ask in a separate message a vote on the original wording. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
