Laurent Blume <laur...@opencsw.org> writes: > On 02/09/13 17:57, Peter FELECAN wrote: >> Laurent Blume <laur...@opencsw.org> writes: >> >>> On 02/09/13 17:27, Peter FELECAN wrote: >>>> Is there a reason to stay on Samba 3 when we will provide Samba 4? >>> >>> Is there a reason to switch to Samba 4 as long as Samba 3 is supported? >> >> Yes: new features, bugs corrected, fun, walking on the bleeding edge, >> &c >> >> Heck, there is unstable, testing and kind of stable; people has the >> freedom to choose. > > So for that, the Debian way is not the right one? > > I am confused by your conflicting statements. > > Please clarify what you are cherry-picking from the Debian model.
Not cherry picking really. As Slow wrote, Debian is going toward a unique prefix supporting the latest stable upstream release. As Fedora will. As for the confusion and conflict I have no real comment at this point in time. Seriously. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list maintainers@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.