On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:44:42PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:29:02 -0400 >> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> We've only had one success report for this so far, and even that seemed >> to have generated some confusion. > >Actually, we had 2 success reports.
I assume that you mean William Hoffman and William Sheehan. I was discounting William Hoffman since he helped develop the patch. >> Given all of the hoopla on the Cygwin list about this functionality, I'd >> feel much more comfortable if a few of the complainers there tested this >> also. > >Me too, but I cannot force any of you to promote the patch on the >Cygwin mailing list. You refused to do that, while William Hoffman >didn't say no, but didn't post anything, either. I don't think it's >reasonable to ask me do more than I already did. I think you're somehow misinterpreting my request. I wasn't asking you to do anything other than hold off incorporating this patch into the make sources. William Hoffman did promote the patch on the cygwin list. That's why William Shehan mentioned he was "working from a link posted to the Cygwin mailing list". William Hoffman got the URL for the patch wrong so maybe it would be useful for William Hoffman to send an updated pointer to the correct patch there. cgf _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
