On 02/10/2007, Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:16:36 +0800 > > From: "Yongwei Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, make-w32@gnu.org > > > > +#! /bin/sh > > +VERSION=`sed -n 's/^AC_INIT(\[GNU make\],\[\([^]]\+\)\].*/\1/p' > > configure.in` > > +sed -e "s/%PACKAGE%/make/" -e "s/%VERSION%/$VERSION/" > > config.h.W32.template > config.h.W32 > > Thanks. > > Personally, I think that requiring a Unixy shell for such a simple job > is an overkill. > > How about the following alternative? > > --- build_w32.bat~0 2007-07-21 19:01:24.376125000 +0300 > +++ build_w32.bat 2007-10-02 17:40:25.453125000 +0200 > @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ > rem You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > rem with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > +if exist config.h.W32 GoTo NotCVS > +sed -n "s/^AC_INIT(\[GNU make\],\[\([^]]\+\)\].*/s,%%VERSION%%,\1,g/p" > configure.in > config.h.W32.sed > +echo s,%%PACKAGE%%,make,g >> config.h.W32.sed > +sed -f config.h.W32.sed config.h.W32.template > config.h.W32 > +:NotCVS > if not exist config.h copy config.h.W32 config.h > cd w32\subproc > echo "Creating the subproc library"
All are silent? Could we first do the undisputed patches, like this one and the w32_kill change? And I think the CVS version should at least build. So I think Eli's patch to change `p[-1] =' is better than the current state, using or not using alloca. --- What do you think? Best regards, Yongwei -- Wu Yongwei URL: http://wyw.dcweb.cn/ _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
