On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 21:57 +0800, Yongwei Wu wrote:
> All are silent? Could we first do the undisputed patches, like this
> one and the w32_kill change?
>
> And I think the CVS version should at least build. So I think Eli's
> patch to change `p[-1] =' is better than the current state, using or
> not using alloca. --- What do you think?
If you guys can come up with a patch everyone seems to agree on, I'll
apply it. I don't even own a Windows system, much less one that can
compile GNU make, so I'm completely at the mercy of the porting folks
for Windows-only issues. I generally don't apply patches unless there
is a clear and firm consensus and agreement from one or more of the
"longstanding" Windows hackers.
I'm not sure exactly what you're suggesting we apply: Eli's last
patches, here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/make-w32%40gnu.org/msg01586.html
and here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/make-w32%40gnu.org/msg01585.html
?
Eli wrote:
> I think Paul said he will install the changes for that when he has
> time.
I can do it tonight if there is agreement on what to apply...
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
_______________________________________________
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
