On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:53:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > I did some backporting because I didn't realise that you'd included
> > ExtUtils::Constant to the MakeMaker bundle. I'd assumed that you'd only
> > backported the modules that provided the functionality present in the
> > 5.005_03 MakeMaker.
>
> I just tossed it all in. It also ment I didn't have to rewrite
> t/ExtUtils.t to tear out the ExtUtils::Constant stuff.
>
> It would probably be best to seperate them into two modules, if
> nothing else so you're not funnelling patches through me. As long as
> MakeMaker can run without ExtUtils::Constant (a dependency the other
> way is ok) we should split them.
I did rip apart ExtUtils.t to test thinks without ExtUtils::Constant.
2 tests are attached: 1 does a simple .pm only module, 1 does .xs too
They aren't that well tested (pass on 5.7.2 and 5.005_03 on arm linux)
and the names are naff and need improving, but I did want to make sure that
the pm only one runs before the xs too one. (and both before ExtUtils.t when
all are in the core perl distribution)
Nicholas Clark
0_pm_only.t
1_xs.t
