We realized about the Selection widgets, and we went ahead and included those in the ApplicationDefinition.xml files that we used. We also noted that the selection does indeed work with the Sheboygan maps, and as soon as you select parcels, the map refreshes to indicate your selection, as well as the SelectionInfo widget shows your selected objects. However, we used the included Aqua ApplicationDefinition.xml template and only changed the .MapDefinition files to reflect our maps instead of Sheboygan and added our custom scripts/urls as widgets to test, and we are having the selection issues. I even removed everything external to the initial Aqua template except for one of our maps to load, and the same thing occurs.

Also of note:
I used the FireBug extension to see the GET and POST commands, and when running the Sheboygan sample, the selection command issues a POST of .../fusion/MapGuide/php/Query.php followed by POST .../fusion/MapGuide/php/Selection.php, whereas our maps only issue POST of .../fusion/MapGuide/php/Query.php. I don't know if that has anything to do with the SelectionInfo showing selected objects for Sheboygan and not for us, or if all of these issues are just interrelated.

Jonathan

Mike Adair wrote:
Note that if you are testing with the fusion/samples/mapguide/standard example, the SelectionPanel and SelectionInfo widgets aren't enabled in the ApplicationDefinition.xml file as shipped. You have to uncomment those widgets in the file. We should probably change that so those widgets are included by default. In RC4 with the Sheboygan map, the selection should be appearing highlighted as soon as it is selected.

Mike



Jason Birch wrote:
Oh, looking at your contribution to that thread, it looks like that problem is Fusion-specific, which is different than ary's problem (which is PostGIS-specific). I'm seeing this Fusion selection problem myself on Windows2k3, IIS installation. Jason

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jason Birch
Sent: Thu 2008-02-21 8:32 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working


Is that just for PostGIS, or is it happening for other feature providers too? Currently Tom has moved that RC4 be tagged as release, so if this is something that is not specific to the PostGIS provider and it is critical, you should make sure to create a ticket in Trac with enough information (data, MGP package, operating system, web server, which viewer you're using) to replicate the problem. If it is PostGIS-specific, then it likely won't be fixed in MapGuide. Bruno Scott is doing a bunch of work on the PostGIS provider currently, so hopfully it will be fixed through his efforts. Jason

________________________________

From: J Manafi
Subject: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working


I was previously having issues with selection (http://www.nabble.com/Postgis-Selection-Problem-%28additional%29-tt15466067s16610.html) where it looked like my objects were selected, but nothing actually was, and RC4 has made great strides to remedy this. However, my current situation is this:

I can use the selection tool to make selections on the map. But, they don't show up unless I click the 'Refresh Map' button. And even then, the statusbar still shows No features selected. But when I run our script, the output is correct and formatted accordingly. Yet, If I make a selection programmatically like stated in the linked post, the selection is highlighted, and the statusbar reads {0} features selected on {1} layers, yet shows that two layers are selected in the selection panel, wells and blocks. And, no matter which block I select--even if the block has nothing inside--the selection panel always shows the same two wells selected. Also, if I make a selection with the tool, I cannot use the 'Clear Selection' tool, but it is available when objects are selected programmatically.

I don't know what is causing this behavior, but these are my observations so far. If I come across anything new, I will update here. At least the selections are working enough to use and test our scripts, and for that, I am glad. ------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users

Reply via email to