Hi Marcin,
Thanks very much for your contribution!
Both patches are applied in the latest trunk.

Regards,
Artem

2009/2/2 Marcin Rudowski <[email protected]>

> Hi
>
> I'm not sure where to post this and hope here would be enough.
>
> Since recently, I'm using Mapnik to render maps for UMP-pcPL which is
> OSM like project for Poland, mainly for Garmin with biggest priority on
> usable routing in this devices (many restrictions):
>
> http://mapa.ump.waw.pl/ump-www/
> http://ump.waw.pl/
>
> In short, I convert polish-format *.mp maps to OSM compatible xml format
> and render with mapnik and customized styles.
>
> I encountered few bugs, that I fixed and decided to share:
>
> - TextSymbolizer option allow_overlap was ignored. This was needed to
> view all available details in closest zoom:
>
> http://mapa.ump.waw.pl/ump-www/?zoom=18&lat=52.54352&lon=19.68832&layers=B00000T
> Fix is only for POI placement.
>
> - png256 format had a bug, that reduced random octcubes in process of
> reducing colors and in effect produced very bad palette in some more
> crowded places:
> http://mapa.ump.waw.pl/ump-www/png256_bug.png
> notice lack of fillings in middle tile, where white color was merged
> with background gray. After fix, it is fine:
>
> http://mapa.ump.waw.pl/ump-www/?zoom=16&lat=52.24661&lon=21.01091&layers=B00000T
> Strange, it didn't appear yet in OSM maps.
> This was a bug in implementation: children_[i]->count is !=0 only on
> leafs parents, so higher levels(with lower index) of reducible_[] were
> practically not sorted.
>
> In attachment there are fixes for both problems. I use mapnik-0.5.1, but
> patches are prepared svn, as there were no significant changes in
> affected files in the meantime.
>
> Marcin Rudowski
> _______________________________________________
> Mapnik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
>
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users

Reply via email to