Nop wrote: > I did not have this problem originally, but I am not sure when it first > occurred. Was there a change to this effect in osm2pgsql? I am using > 0.66-16423. Is there a way to globally force osm2pgsql not to make this > assumption? > > What are the exact rules osm2pgsql uses in this case?
Jon should be able to tell you. The version you have, 0.66-16423, does sound a bit dated. Could you try updating osm2pgsql too? The main mapnik layer is showing them, but it doesn't have various route-related columns in default.style, which you might have. -- Lennard _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
