Hi Mapnik Fans, I'm having a little trouble interpreting this graph, showing the results from the WMS shootout at FOSS4G. It looks to me like Mapnik, and Dane's Paleoserver, performed better than any of the other competitors on the graph. GeoServer, Constellation and Oracle appear in the legend, but not in the results, so I'm not sure what that means.
http://mapnik.org/news/2010/sep/10/wms_benchmarking_2010/ Congratulations on the great performance improvement over the last while, Dane! _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
