El día Wednesday 15 September 2010 15:12:29, Richard Weait dijo: > I'm having a little trouble interpreting this graph, showing the > results from the WMS shootout at FOSS4G. It looks to me like Mapnik, > and Dane's Paleoserver, performed better than any of the other > competitors on the graph.
Well, Mapnik did perform best in ONE of the tests. *But* Mapnik did not even enter several of the other tests. No raster reprojection, no other stuff. Conclusion: So far, Mapnik does one thing, but does it very well. -- Iván Sánchez Ortega <[email protected]> Un ordenador no es una televisión ni un microondas: es una herramienta compleja. _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
