Including YARN-1695 makes sense, just made it a blocker to ensure we get it
in. YARN-1492 - would be great if we get it in, but I am not sure how
feasible it is. Given it is being developed on a branch, there is also the
merge to trunk and branch-2 overhead.

I would prefer branching soon so we can work towards stabilizing the
branch. People can continue to commit blockers to branch-2.5.




On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vino...@apache.org> wrote:

> Like I mentioned before, I'd like to get RM-webservices : YARN-1695
> included. May be we can wait for the branch till that point of time.
>
> I am also pushing for Shared Cache: YARN-1492 reviews. Again, like I said
> before, we can take it as we go.
>
> +Vinod
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > For 2.5, looks like there are only 6 JIRAs marked Blocker and another 19
> > Critical ones [1]. I guess it makes sense to cut a branch for 2.5 and
> work
> > on getting the remaining items in.
> >
> > I ll go ahead and create the 2.5 branch in the next couple of days. I
> hope
> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization is the right
> > steps to follow.
> >
> > [1] JIRA Query: project in (Hadoop, HDFS, YARN, MapReduce) AND
> resolution =
> > Unresolved AND "Target Version/s" = 2.5.0 AND priority in (Blocker)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> > vino...@apache.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I started reviewing YARN-1492 and synced up offline with Sangjin and
> > Chris
> > > who are leading this. I proposed that we should get the reviews and
> > commits
> > > going as they go and then mark the feature alpha, beta or stable
> > depending
> > > on how far we are ahead with the feature and how it aligns with the
> > release
> > > in progress.
> > >
> > > +Vinod
> > >
> > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It would be great if we can consider the shared cache (YARN-1492) as
> > part
> > > > of 2.5. It obviously will depend on the reviews from folks, but the
> > > feature
> > > > itself should be reasonably solid.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sangjin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks Karthik!
> > > >>
> > > >> I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap with features
> > which
> > > >> are very close to completion. Let's see if that makes sense and if
> we
> > > get
> > > >> any further feedback.
> > > >>
> > > >> Arun
> > > >>
> > > >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS
> doubts, I
> > > >> might
> > > >>> need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy <
> a...@hortonworks.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Folks,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'd appreciate some help here. Due to family reasons (all good
> > ones),
> > > >>>> I'll be away for a couple of weeks. Can someone else pick up the
> RM
> > > >> duties
> > > >>>> for hadoop-2.5? Maybe Andrew since he's expressed interest in the
> > > past?
> > > >> I
> > > >>>> will pick up the thread again for hadoop-2.6, but I don't want to
> > > block
> > > >>>> hadoop-2.5 due to my non-availability.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> thanks,
> > > >>>> Arun
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Folks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several items
> > are
> > > >>>> still a bit away from being ready.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I think rather than wait for them, it will be useful to create an
> > > >>>> intermediate release (2.5) this month - I think ATS security is
> > pretty
> > > >>>> close, so we can ship that. I'm thinking of creating hadoop-2.5 by
> > end
> > > >> of
> > > >>>> the month, with a branch a couple of weeks prior.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thoughts?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> thanks,
> > > >>>>> Arun
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > >>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > > >> entity to
> > > >>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > > confidential,
> > > >>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > > >> reader
> > > >>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > notified
> > > >> that
> > > >>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > >>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> > > >>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > >> immediately
> > > >>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Arun C. Murthy
> > > >> Hortonworks Inc.
> > > >> http://hortonworks.com/hdp/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > > entity to
> > > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > confidential,
> > > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > > reader
> > > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to