Spoke to Vinod offline. The tentative plan is cut branch-2.5 middle of next week and work towards getting the remaining blockers in as soon as possible.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Including YARN-1695 makes sense, just made it a blocker to ensure we get > it in. YARN-1492 - would be great if we get it in, but I am not sure how > feasible it is. Given it is being developed on a branch, there is also the > merge to trunk and branch-2 overhead. > > I would prefer branching soon so we can work towards stabilizing the > branch. People can continue to commit blockers to branch-2.5. > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > vino...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Like I mentioned before, I'd like to get RM-webservices : YARN-1695 >> included. May be we can wait for the branch till that point of time. >> >> I am also pushing for Shared Cache: YARN-1492 reviews. Again, like I said >> before, we can take it as we go. >> >> +Vinod >> Hortonworks Inc. >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > For 2.5, looks like there are only 6 JIRAs marked Blocker and another 19 >> > Critical ones [1]. I guess it makes sense to cut a branch for 2.5 and >> work >> > on getting the remaining items in. >> > >> > I ll go ahead and create the 2.5 branch in the next couple of days. I >> hope >> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization is the right >> > steps to follow. >> > >> > [1] JIRA Query: project in (Hadoop, HDFS, YARN, MapReduce) AND >> resolution = >> > Unresolved AND "Target Version/s" = 2.5.0 AND priority in (Blocker) >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >> > vino...@apache.org >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > I started reviewing YARN-1492 and synced up offline with Sangjin and >> > Chris >> > > who are leading this. I proposed that we should get the reviews and >> > commits >> > > going as they go and then mark the feature alpha, beta or stable >> > depending >> > > on how far we are ahead with the feature and how it aligns with the >> > release >> > > in progress. >> > > >> > > +Vinod >> > > >> > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > It would be great if we can consider the shared cache (YARN-1492) as >> > part >> > > > of 2.5. It obviously will depend on the reviews from folks, but the >> > > feature >> > > > itself should be reasonably solid. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Sangjin >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Thanks Karthik! >> > > >> >> > > >> I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap with features >> > which >> > > >> are very close to completion. Let's see if that makes sense and if >> we >> > > get >> > > >> any further feedback. >> > > >> >> > > >> Arun >> > > >> >> > > >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS >> doubts, I >> > > >> might >> > > >>> need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy < >> a...@hortonworks.com >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Folks, >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> I'd appreciate some help here. Due to family reasons (all good >> > ones), >> > > >>>> I'll be away for a couple of weeks. Can someone else pick up the >> RM >> > > >> duties >> > > >>>> for hadoop-2.5? Maybe Andrew since he's expressed interest in the >> > > past? >> > > >> I >> > > >>>> will pick up the thread again for hadoop-2.6, but I don't want to >> > > block >> > > >>>> hadoop-2.5 due to my non-availability. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> thanks, >> > > >>>> Arun >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>>> Folks, >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several >> items >> > are >> > > >>>> still a bit away from being ready. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> I think rather than wait for them, it will be useful to create >> an >> > > >>>> intermediate release (2.5) this month - I think ATS security is >> > pretty >> > > >>>> close, so we can ship that. I'm thinking of creating hadoop-2.5 >> by >> > end >> > > >> of >> > > >>>> the month, with a branch a couple of weeks prior. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Thoughts? >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> thanks, >> > > >>>>> Arun >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> -- >> > > >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > >>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> > > >> entity to >> > > >>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is >> > > confidential, >> > > >>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If >> the >> > > >> reader >> > > >>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby >> > notified >> > > >> that >> > > >>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > >>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you >> have >> > > >>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > > >> immediately >> > > >>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > >>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> Arun C. Murthy >> > > >> Hortonworks Inc. >> > > >> http://hortonworks.com/hdp/ >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> > > entity to >> > > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is >> > confidential, >> > > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >> > > reader >> > > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified >> > > that >> > > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you >> have >> > > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > > immediately >> > > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >> entity >> > to >> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is >> confidential, >> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >> reader >> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> > that >> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> > immediately >> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > > >> > >> >> -- >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity >> to >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> that >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender >> immediately >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >> > >
