For timeline service v2, we have completed all subtasks under YARN-5355 [1].
We initiated a merge-to-trunk vote [2] yesterday. thanks Vrushali [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5355 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201708.mbox/%3CCAE=b_fblt2j+ezb4wqdn_uwbig1sd5kpqgaw+9br__zou5y...@mail.gmail.com%3E On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < vino...@apache.org> wrote: > Agreed. I was very clearly not advocating for rushing in features. If you > have followed my past emails, I have only strongly advocated features be > worked in branches and get merged when they are in a reasonable state. > > Each branch contributor group should look at their readiness and merge > stuff in assuming that the branch reached a satisfactory state. That’s it. > > From release management perspective, blocking features just because we are > a month close to the deadline is not reasonable. Let the branch > contributors rationalize, make this decision and the rest of us can support > them in making the decision. > > +Vinod > > > At this point, there have been three planned alphas from September 2016 > until July 2017 to "get in features". While a couple of upcoming features > are "a few weeks" away, I think all of us are aware how predictable > software development schedules can be. I think we can also all agree that > rushing just to meet a release deadline isn't the best practice when it > comes to software development either. > > > > Andrew has been very clear about his goals at each step and I think > Wangda's willingness to not rush in resource types was an appropriate > response. I'm sympathetic to the goals of getting in a feature for 3.0, > but it might be a good idea for each project that is a "few weeks away" to > seriously look at the readiness compared to the features which have been > testing for 6+ months already. > > > > -Ray > >
