It looks like your partitioner is an inner class. Try making it static:

public static class MOPartition extends Partitioner<Text, Text>
        public MOPartition() {}

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Piyush Kansal <piyush.kan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am right now stuck with an issue while extending the Partitioner class:
>
> public class MOPartition extends Partitioner<Text, Text>
>         public MOPartition() {}
>
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
> globalSort$MOPartition.<init>()
>
> I tried defining a empty constructor but still it didnt help. My JRE version
> is 1.6.0.26.
>
> Can you please suggest what can be the issue?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Piyush Kansal <piyush.kan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Harsh. I will try it and will get back to you.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not think you can do it out of the box with streaming, but
>>> last.fm's Dumbo (highly recommended if you use Python M/R) and its
>>> add-on Feathers libraries can do it apparently.
>>>
>>> See Erik Forsberg's detailed answer (second) on
>>>
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1626786/generating-separate-output-files-in-hadoop-streaming
>>> for more.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Piyush Kansal <piyush.kan...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Thanks for the immediate reply Harsh. I will try using it.
>>> >
>>> > By the way, cant we achieve the same goal with Hadoop Streaming (using
>>> > Python)?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Piyush,
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes. Currently the partitioned data is always sorted by (and then
>>> >> grouped by) keys before the reduce() calls begin.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Piyush Kansal
>>> >> <piyush.kan...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Thanks Harsh.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > But will it also sort the data as Partitioner does.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hi,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> You would find it easier to use the Java API's MultipleOutputs
>>> >> >> (and/or
>>> >> >> MultipleOutputFormat, which directly works on a configured key
>>> >> >> field),
>>> >> >> to write each key-partition out in its own file.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Piyush Kansal
>>> >> >> <piyush.kan...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Hi Friends,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I have to sort huge amount of data in minimum possible time
>>> >> >> > probably
>>> >> >> > using
>>> >> >> > partitioning. The key is composed of 3 fields(partition, text and
>>> >> >> > number).
>>> >> >> > This is how partition is defined:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Partition "1" for range 1-10
>>> >> >> > Partition "2" for range 11-20
>>> >> >> > Partition "3" for range 21-30
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I/P file format: partition[tab]text[tab]range-start[tab]range-end
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ cat input1
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 1 10
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 2 8
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 11 18
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ cat input2
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 3 7
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 12 19
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ cat input3
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 3 chr1 22 30
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ cat input4
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 3 chr1 22 30
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 9 10
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 15 16
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Then I ran following command:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > hadoop jar
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > /usr/lib/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-streaming-0.20.2-cdh3u2.jar
>>> >> >> > \
>>> >> >> > -D stream.map.output.field.separator='\t' \
>>> >> >> > -D stream.num.map.output.key.fields=3 \
>>> >> >> > -D map.output.key.field.separator='\t' \
>>> >> >> > -D mapred.text.key.partitioner.options=-k1 \
>>> >> >> > -D mapred.reduce.tasks=3 \
>>> >> >> > -input /usr/pkansal/kMer2/ip \
>>> >> >> > -output /usr/pkansal/kMer2/op \
>>> >> >> > -mapper /home/cloudera/kMer2/kMer2Map.py \
>>> >> >> > -file /home/cloudera/kMer2/kMer2Map.py \
>>> >> >> > -reducer /home/cloudera/kMer2/kMer2Red.py \
>>> >> >> > -file /home/cloudera/kMer2/kMer2Red.py
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Both mapper and reducer scripts just contain one line of code:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > for line in sys.stdin:
>>> >> >> >     line = line.strip()
>>> >> >> >     print "%s" % (line)
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Following is the o/p:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ hadoop dfs -cat
>>> >> >> > /usr/pkansal/kMer2/op/part-00000
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 12 19
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 15 16
>>> >> >> > 3 chr1 22 30
>>> >> >> > 3 chr1 22 30
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ hadoop dfs -cat
>>> >> >> > /usr/pkansal/kMer2/op/part-00001
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 2 8
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 3 7
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 9 10
>>> >> >> > 2 chr1 11 18
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > [cloudera@localhost kMer2]$ hadoop dfs -cat
>>> >> >> > /usr/pkansal/kMer2/op/part-00002
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 1 chr1 1 10
>>> >> >> > 3 chr1 22 29
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > This is not the o/p which I expected. I expected all records
>>> >> >> > with:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > partition 1 in one single file eg part-m-00000
>>> >> >> > partition 2 in one single file eg part-m-00001
>>> >> >> > partition 3 in one single file eg part-m-00002
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Can you please suggest if I am doing it in a right way?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > --
>>> >> >> > Regards,
>>> >> >> > Piyush Kansal
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Harsh J
>>> >> >> Customer Ops. Engineer
>>> >> >> Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Regards,
>>> >> > Piyush Kansal
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Harsh J
>>> >> Customer Ops. Engineer
>>> >> Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Piyush Kansal
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Harsh J
>>> Customer Ops. Engineer
>>> Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Piyush Kansal
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Piyush Kansal
>



-- 
Joseph Echeverria
Cloudera, Inc.
443.305.9434

Reply via email to