Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me,
who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-)
Best regards,
Tamas
2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette <dmorisse...@mapgears.com
<mailto:dmorisse...@mapgears.com>>
On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could
indeed be taken into account when accessing the source layers,
by using
a minor change.
If that's not the case already then I think MINSCALEDENOM,
MAXSCALEDENOM from the source layer should be taken into account by
default with UNION layers. i.e. when one sets up a layer with
min/max scale, it is normally because the data is not appropriate
for use at other scales, so I see no reason to expose via in the
union layer outside of those scales either.
I agree with this. Additionally SYMBOLSCALEDENOM, LABELMINSCALEDENOM and
LABELMAXSCALEDENOM could also be taken into account for similar reasons.
Greetings, Jana.
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
