" Rather than inventing complex rules about which item goes with which report, if you have three failures, send three reports"
I think there is going to be a lot of push back for multiple failure reports per email - would definitely be better to find the best way to specify the multiple failures within one email for the email that had the failures in it. - i.e. one to one > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > John Levine > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-marf-authfailure- > report-03.txt > > This draft is a great improvement. > > I would strongly suggest changing the text to say there must be exactly one > authentication-results header in the report. If there's more than one, > particularly if there are multiple DKIM failures, there's no way to tell which > other parts of the report go with which a-r header. > > Note that multiple DKIM failures could easily have multiple reported > domains, multiple auth-failure, dkim-domain, dkim-identity, dkim-selector, > dkim-canonicalized-header, and dkim-canonicalized body. (Remember that > there are two different ways to canonicalize each.) > > Rather than inventing complex rules about which item goes with which > report, if you have three failures, send three reports. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > marf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
