> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > R Levine > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:24 PM > To: Hilda Fontana > Cc: 'ARF mailing list' > Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-03.txt > > > I totally agree I was thinking more of the push back from those generating > > them rather than those receiving them. > > Well, OK. Given that ARF messages are invariably generated by software > rather than by people, what problem is caused by them generating two or > three messages to report multiple failures rather than one?
I have to say I agree that the idea of sending one report for every DKIM/SPF failure on a message is un-pretty, but it's less un-pretty than the two syntactical alternatives that have been put forward in this thread. -MSK, as participant _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
