On 06/Nov/11 05:53, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > There isn’t currently a mechanism for indicating the report contains > redacted segments. So far, the sites that have implemented this don’t > appear to have a need for doing so. I’m not sure it’s necessary; the > goal is to have the redacted segments be invariant when the original > strings are also invariant, which is accomplished without the need for > signaling redaction. I’d like to hear other opinions on this point > though.
Redaction obviously breaks DKIM. Sites that rely on that for telling whether a message really originated at theirs may confuse redacted messages and spoofs. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
