> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SM > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 2:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-marf- redaction > > If the aim is to redact sensitive information, it is up to the sender > to identify the parts of the text that contain personal identifiers > and apply the algorithm. That would cover full names. The term > "personally identifiable information" is generally used. I prefer > not to get into that to avoid having to explain how to identify such > information in a message.
Right, and I don't think we should either. Providing the mechanism is sufficient. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
