On 05.01.2012 01:09, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> From: ietf.org On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
>
>> I'm sorry I didn't notice this before, but I think that:
>>
>> spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF record produced a
>> "fail", "softfail", "temperror" or "permerror" result.
>>
>> should also include "none". For some policy scenarios that would be
>> considered a failure, so we ought to be able to express it.
>
> Maybe a simpler thing to say overall is:
>
> spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF record produced a failing
> result, meaning either an actual SPF failure (e.g., "fail", "softfail",
> "temperror", or "permerror") or any other result that was not acceptable
> for local policy reasons.
That may work for me. I'd keep it even more generic, e.g.
spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF (or TXT) record produced a
result that was not acceptable, unusual, or anyhow conspicuous under the
provisions of the relevant reporting agreement.
Either way, I think that can cover any future SPF extension as well.
jm2c
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
