On Thursday, January 05, 2012 09:10:30 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Alessandro Vesely Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:58 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: > > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-09.txt > > > > That may work for me. I'd keep it even more generic, e.g. > > > > spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF (or TXT) record > > produced a> > > result that was not acceptable, unusual, or anyhow conspicuous > > under the provisions of the relevant reporting agreement. > > Even simpler: > > spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF record produced something > other than a "pass" result, which the report generator considers to be a > reportable incident. This can include the usual set of failure results, or > any result that is considered a failure under local policy constraints.
I think it's a mistake to report non-SPF results as SPF result. This includes policy overrides or the results of some hypothetical SPF extension. That the message is intended to communicate some kind of failure is implicit in the message type. The data element we are discussing is for SPF results and should only include those (and it should include all of them). Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
