>>You say to use a null bounce address and a HELO with a domain that >>produces an SPF Pass. I say use whatever bounce address you want, but >>be sure that it produces an SPF Pass. I don't see any practical >>advantage to requiring a null bounce address. If it's not null, and >>the r= address doesn't work, the reporter might get the report bounced >>back, but if I were a reporter I'd prefer to know if my reports were >>going into the void so I could stop sending them. > >The advantage of null mail from is no bounce loops.
Right, and the disadvantage is no feedback if it's bouncing. >How would you feel about SHOULD use null mail from (with EHLO/HELO SPF pass), >but >MUST avoid mail loops and Mail From, if not null, MUST pass SPF? Make it MAY use null bounce address and we have a deal. And whether or not it's null, it MUST pass SPF. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
