In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/04/2012
at 10:07 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>What do others think about this point? Given the number of direct
>complaints John, Yakov and I got from Yahoo members when Yahoo
>decided to accept only ARF reports, it seems like we might be able to
>say we have experience that this creates a big problem for a lot of
>people.
"The avalanche has already started; it is too late for the pebbles to
vote." I agree that the exerience is already here and that we should
take note of it.
>And it's true that software to generate ARFs will start appearing,
>if it hasn't already.
It's on my todo list[1], and I'd be astonished if there weren't many
others.
[1] Currently hung up on some dependency issues and also waiting
for discovery to firm up.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
