In
<CAC4RtVCO=+UfZWY6qXi-fvLPzONcGC5=8mpprmtwk7vpr-k...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 01/31/2012
at 04:23 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> said:
>Here begins a last call for the MARF working group on the subject
>document, detailed below.
A minor point:
3. MUAs SHOULD NOT generate abuse reports directly to entities
found in the message or by queries to WHOIS or other heuristic
means. Rather, the MUA should signal, by some means, the
mailbox provider to which it connects to generate such a
report.
What about an MUA that prepares an abuse report and requests editing
and submission from the user?
MUA's that generate abuse reports for manual submission by
the user SHOULD include guidance on where to submit them
and a warning about possible forgeries.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
