On Monday, February 06, 2012 05:40:24 PM John Levine wrote: > I have to say that I'm not thrilled that sections 3, 4, and 5 still > include the r= remote mailbombing feature.
I thought we had agreed we didn't want that? I changed the SPF draft to provide local part only and I think they should be the same. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
